- Title
-
Zebrafish Infection: From Pathogenesis to Cell Biology
- Authors
- Torraca, V., Mostowy, S.
- Source
- Full text @ Trends Cell Biol.
Approaches for Genetic Manipulation of Zebrafish. (A) Injection of constructs and chemicals in zebrafish eggs. Transient depletion can be performed by injection of morpholino oligonucleotides, RNA-binding oligomers that block translation/maturation of a specific (pre)-mRNA. Morpholinos can sometimes elicit off-target effects, therefore, it is important to validate phenotypes using alternative strategies and/or rescue experiments before conclusions can be fully drawn. Transient expression of genes can be obtained by injection of synthesized mRNA or plasmid DNA bearing an expression construct. Injected mRNAs will be expressed ubiquitously, while injection of plasmids enables cell- or tissue-specific expression. Zebrafish eggs can stably integrate DNA, which can be used to obtain stable transgenic lines or insertional mutants. The frequency of transgenesis is low when injecting DNA alone, but can be increased using transposases (i.e., Tol2) or meganucleases (i.e., I-SceI meganuclease). Zebrafish stable mutants can be efficiently generated with ZFNs, TALENs, or CRISPR/Cas9. These systems are based on induction of a site-specific double-stranded break, which is repaired via an error-prone non-homologous end joining mechanism. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has recently become the most common method to generate zebrafish mutants. Additionally, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has also been adapted to generate conditional/tissue-specific knockouts. Mutants are obtained by injecting mRNA or protein for the nuclease (together with guide RNA in the case of CRISPR/Cas9) in zebrafish eggs. Conditional/tissue-specific mutants are obtained by integration of a construct where Cas9 expression is controlled by an inducible or tissue-specific promoter. DNA constructs for stable integration can be designed with flanking homology recombination arms, which drive integration into a precise locus, and allow generation of knock-in lines. Generation of precise knock-in zebrafish is still challenging but can be facilitated by introducing double strand breaks at the site of interest (i.e., using TALENs or CRISPR/Cas9) |
Methods for Studying Host–Pathogen Interactions Using Zebrafish. (A) Routes of zebrafish injection. Larvae can be injected locally into the YS or in body cavities, such as the HV and OV. Other compartments for injection include SC, IM, or the NC. HV, OV, IM, and TF infection all permit study of immune cell recruitment. The NC is inaccessible to immune cells but is valuable to model bone and cartilage inflammation. Injection into the circulation can be achieved by intravenous injections, for example via the CV/BI or the DC. This results in a rapid systemic dissemination of microbes throughout the body. (B) Chemical treatments. Zebrafish are suitable for toxicology research and for screening of libraries of bioactive compounds, including antimicrobials, because molecules in the bath water can be absorbed via the zebrafish skin. Survival and bacterial burden can be quantified to compare susceptibility of different genetic conditions or to assess the effect of chemicals/therapeutics in disease prevention. (C) Intravital imaging. Host–pathogen interactions can be followed |
(A) Upon |