IMAGE

FIGURE 4

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-221018-152
Source
Figures for Liu et al., 2022
Image
Figure Caption

FIGURE 4

Expression of sox17, sox32, cdh1, and cdh2. (A) GFP is expressed in endodermal cells and DFCs at 80% epiboly in Tg (sox17:GFP) transgenic line (DFCs are circled with a white square). (B) Expression of sox17 was examined using WISH at 80% epiboly. b1, normal sox17 at 28.5°C (100%, n = 67); b2, normal sox17 at 22°C (42.8%, n = 74, p < 0.002); b3 dispersed expression of sox17 at 22°C (57.2%, n = 74, p < 0.001). DFCs (white arrow). (C) Number DFCs and migration situation of DFCs. C1, DFCs with normal migration at 28.5°C (91.6%, n = 12); c2, DFCs with normal migration at 22°C (41.7%, n = 12, p < 0.003); c3, dispersed DFCs at 22°C (38.3%, n = 12, p < 0.002); c4: dispersed DFCs at 22°C (20%, n = 12, p < 0.004). Scale bar, 40 μm. (D) Statistical analysis of DFC number. n = 12; ns, not significant (E) Expression of sox32 at 80% epiboly. e1, normal sox17 at 28.5°C (98.9%, n = 64); e2, normal sox17 at 22°C (63.2%, n = 70, p < 0.01); e3, dispersed expression of sox17 at 22°C (36.8%, n = 70, p < 0.03). DFCs (white arrow). (F) Expression of cdh1 at 80% epiboly. f1, normal cdh1 at 28.5°C (97.3%, n = 107); f2, decreased expression of cdh1 in the DFC field at 22°C (73.5%, n = 111, p < 0.001); f3, weak expression of cdh1 in the DFC field at 22°C (26.5%, n = 111, p < 0.01). DFC field (white circle). (G) Percentages of normal, decreased, and weak expression of cdh1 in embryos treated at 28.5°C or 22°C. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) could be seen between the embryos treated at 28.5 vs 22°C. (H) Expression of cdh2 in 80% epiboly. h1, normal cdh2 at 28.5°C (97%, n = 122); h2, decreased expression of cdh1 in the DFC field at 22°C (68.4%, n = 127, p < 0.001); h3, weak expression of cdh1 in the DFC field at 22°C (31.6%, n = 127, p < 0.003). DFC field (white circle). (I) Percentages of normal, decreased, and weak expression of cdh2 in embryos treated at 28.5°C or 22°C. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.003) could be seen between the embryos treated at 28.5 vs 22°C. (J) Percentage of normal looping, reversed looping, and no looping of the heart in embryos treated at 22°C (as control) and embryos treated at 22°C plus overexpression of cdh1/cdh2 mRNA in DFCs. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) could be seen between control embryos and embryos injected with cdh1/cdh2 mRNA. (K) Percentage of normal liver, reversed liver, and liver bifida in embryos treated at 22°C and embryos treated at 22°C plus overexpression of cdh1/cdh2 mRNA in DFCs. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) could be seen between them. (L) Mechanism diagram. Ns, not significant; “*“p < 0.05; “**“p < 0.03; and “***“p < 0.001.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Front Cell Dev Biol