ZFIN Image: Quint et al., 2021, Fig. 2

Image

Figure Caption

Fig. 2 Opposite refractive error in <italic>gjd2a</italic> (Cx35.5) and <italic>gjd2b</italic> (Cx35.1) mutants.

a Schematic illustration of the eccentric photorefractor setup. b Calibration by −6 diopter (D), −2D, 0D, +4D, and +10D lenses led to a conversion factor of 1.924 (R² = 0.971). c Typical intensity profile of a hyperopic (asterisk) 3mpf gjd2a (Cx35.5) mutant and myopic (arrowhead) lrp2 mutant. The gjd2b (Cx35.1) mutant shows both myopic (arrowhead) and hyperopic (asterisk) contralateral features. d, e RE in the gjd2a (Cx35.5) (d) and gjd2b (Cx35.1) (e) mutants at 1.5 mpf, 2 mpf, 3 mpf, and 9 mpf. d Loss of Cx35.5 (gjd2a) results in a significant (p < 0.001) and progressive hyperopic shift in refractive status. e Loss of Cx35.1 (gjd2b) is linked to a significant (p < 0.001) and progressive myopic shift. f Mutant refractive status normalized against the baseline refraction of WT controls, indicated by the relative RE. Sample size: n = 20 eyes for each genotype and age. Error bars: SEM. Significance: ns = not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Scale bars: 50 µm (c). RE refractive error.

Figure Data

Phenotype details

Acknowledgments

This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Commun Biol