IMAGE

Fig. S4

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-160630-23
Source
Figures for Soulika et al., 2016
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. S4

Comparison of taste buds (A-B), their number (C), total number of cells of each type (D-G) and ratios of cells (per cell type and per taste bud, H-M) in wild-type and ascl1a-/- larvae mouth lips. The phenotype of taste buds and general larval morphology is indistinguishable between wild-type and heterozygous ascl1a+/- larvae and therefore, these data were grouped as ‘wild-type’. Data from 10 wild-type (wt: grouped 6 wild-type and 4 wild-type siblings from heterozygous ascl1a+/- crosses, n=133 taste buds) and 10 ascl1a-/- larvae (n=169 taste buds, 5dpf, fixed tissue), except D (n=11, ‘wild-type’= 6 wild-type and 5 wild-type siblings from heterozygous ascl1a+/- crosses, 62hpf, fixed tissue). In the boxplots, black lines show median values and red spots, mean values. A,B confocal projections showing the taste buds of the mouth lips of a wild-type and an ascl1a-/- larva. ascl1a-/- larvae were devoid of 5-HT cells (B,F,J), had non significant difference in the number of tg(fgf8a.dr17:gfp) expressing cells (D,E,H) but had increased number of taste buds (C) and Calb2 (Type II) expressing cells (G,I) compared to the wild-type. K shows the ratio of cells per taste bud that coexpress tg(fgf8a.dr17:gfp) and Calb2. L shows the ratio of Calb2/Type II cells that co-express tg(fgf8a.dr17:gfp) within a taste bud. M shows the ratio of tg(fgf8a.dr17:gfp) cells that co-express Calb2/Type II cells within a taste bud. 5-HT cells co-expressing tg(fgf8a.dr17:gfp) at 5dpf were rare (n=7/115 cells 5-HT cells). N: The number of total cells varies from one developing taste bud to another at 5dpf. A significant difference was found between the distributions of the total number of cells per taste bud between wild-type and ascl1a mouth lips. Statistical tests: C: Welch two-sample t-test : t = -8.2832, df = 17.384, p-value = 1.923e-07. D: Two-sample Kolmogorov- Smirnov : D = 0.4545, p-value = 0.2058. E: Welch two-sample t-test : t = -1.4604, df = 16.982, p-value = 0.1624. F: Welch two-sample t-test : t = 26.8582, df = 9, p-value = 6.655e-10. G: Welch two-sample t-test : t = - 4.8152, df = 17.968, p-value = 0.0001394. H: Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov : D = 0.0799, p-value = 0.7283. I: Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov : D = 0.4844, p-value = 1.332e-15. J: Two-sample Kolmogorov- Smirnov : D = 0.8647, p-value < 2.2e-16. K: Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov : D = 0.1216, p-value = 0.2211. L: Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov : D = 0.1282, p-value = 0.1732. M: Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov : D = 0.1098, p-value = 0.3313 N: Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov : D = 0.2529, p-value = 0.0001469.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Development